In the recent election, Missouri voters narrowly defeated (by a margin of 50.8% to 49.2%) a ballot initiative that would have raised state excise taxes on all tobacco products, would have regulated cigarette rolling machines and would have increased the amount of money that nonparticipating manufacturers are required to place into escrow accounts.
Troutman Sanders Tobacco Practice Quoted on Election Outcome
Troutman Sanders Tobacco practice partner Bryan Haynes was recently quoted in a Law360 article regarding the impact of the recent presidential election on federal regulation of consumer goods.
Cigarette Warning Label Dispute Headed to High Court?
Several tobacco product manufacturers and a retailer recently requested that the United States Supreme Court consider their challenge to FDA’s requirement for graphic warning labels on cigarette packages. The tobacco companies are requesting that the Supreme Court reverse the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision finding that the warning label requirement does not violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Massachusetts Bill Would Ban Tobacco Products
The Massachusetts legislature is considering a bill (House Bill 1512) that would ban all tobacco products in the state.
Cigar Manufacturer Responds to Representative Waxman’s Call for Immediate FDA Regulation of Cigars
Cigar manufacturer Prime Time International has responded to U.S. Representative Henry Waxman’s request that FDA immediately regulate cigars and other tobacco products. (We previously reported on Representative Waxman’s August 27, 2012 request here.) Prime Time International’s response, a copy of which can be found here, makes a compelling case for delaying FDA regulation of cigars pending further study.
Philip Morris Parent Company Uses Exemption to FDA Marketing Requirements to Name Richmond Theater
Earlier this year, Altria Group Inc. (the parent company of cigarette manufacturer Philip Morris USA) announced that it had purchased for $10 million the naming rights for Richmond’s Landmark Theater. Some industry observers wondered how this was possible, when regulations promulgated by the Food & Drug Administration pursuant to the Tobacco Control Act generally prohibit cigarette and smokeless tobacco manufacturers from sponsoring athletic, musical, artistic, or other social or cultural events.
Court Dismisses Philip Morris Lawsuit Challenging Tobacco Buyout Calculations
We previously reported that in February 2011, Philip Morris filed a federal lawsuit challenging the United States Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA”) calculation of tobacco buyout assessments under the Fair and Equitable Tobacco Reform Act of 2004 (“FETRA”) for fiscal years 2011-2014. The lawsuit challenged a USDA regulation providing that buyout assessments for large cigars for fiscal years 2011-2014 would be calculated using the federal excise tax rate (“FET”) in effect in fiscal year 2005, rather than the new increased FET rates that took effect under the Children’s Heath Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“CHIPRA”) in April 2009.
Troutman Sanders Tobacco Practice Publishes Article in Smokeshop Magazine
An article by the Troutman Sanders Tobacco practice appears in the October issue of Smokeshop Magazine.
Star Scientific’s Settlement with R. J. Reynolds Leaves Star Free to Enforce Tobacco Curing Patents
Star Scientific and R. J. Reynolds have settled their long-running litigation over Star’s patents covering a curing process that prevents the formation of some cancer-causing chemicals in tobacco. The settlement leaves in place a federal appeals court decision that Star’s patents are not invalid and so removes a potential cloud over the validity of the patents. Star thus can now seek to enforce the patent against other tobacco manufacturers whom it believes are using its patented curing process.
Are Cigars with “Characterizing Flavors” Next on the Public Health Crusade’s Hit List?
The New Jersey legislature recently introduced a bill that would ban “characterizing flavors” (except tobacco, clove or menthol) in cigars. (The law’s ban on characterizing flavors in tobacco products currently extends only to cigarettes, thereby mimicking the federal ban.)