Troutman Sanders tobacco team partner Bryan Haynes was quoted in a May 13 Convenience Store News article that recapped “tidbits” gleaned from this year’s TMA’s Annual Conference and Meeting, which was held in Williamsburg, Virginia.
Altria Files Suit Against FDA regarding “Black & Mild” Brand Name
On May 26, 2016, Altria Group, Inc. filed suit against the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in a bid to keep using the Black & Mild brand name for its popular cigars.
Tobacco Practice Partner Quoted in Cuban Cigars Article
Troutman Sanders tobacco team partner Bryan Haynes was interviewed for a May 22nd Tampa Bay Times article titled “U.S. fans of Cuban cigars still have long wait before they can be sold here.” The report describes trials and tribulations facing Cuban manufacturers of premium cigars in light of the new deeming regulations published by the FDA on May 10, 2016.
Troutman Sanders Tobacco Team Participates in Panel at TMA Annual Meeting and Conference
On May 11, 2016, Bryan Haynes participated in a panel regarding “The Tobacco Control Act Seven Years Later” during the TMA Annual Meeting and Conference at the Kingsmill Resort in Williamsburg, Virginia. The panelists discussed the impact of the Tobacco Control Act on their law practices including the consequences of the finalized deeming regulations, best practices in advising clients trying to navigate the FDA regulatory process and tips for manufacturers in preparing for the future.
Deeming Regulations — Initial Impressions — Warnings
Nicotine: The deeming regulations promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration contain new warning requirements for certain tobacco products, including cigars, pipe tobacco, e-cigarettes, vapor products, hookah tobacco, dissolvables, and nicotine gel. Effective August 8, 2018, a nicotine health warning is required on packaging and advertisements. The language is:
“WARNING: This product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical.”
Deeming Regulations — Initial Impressions — Premarket Review
This will be the first part in our continuing series of posts discussing certain aspects of the FDA’s proposed deeming regulations, which were issued today.
This part focuses on the premarket review process that will be applicable to the newly deemed products — principally e-cigarettes, cigars, and pipe tobacco. The FDA contemplates that the premarket review process applicable to currently regulated tobacco products (cigarettes, smokeless tobacco and cigarette tobacco) will be equally applicable to the newly deemed products. Significantly, the statutory grandfather date of February 15, 2007 applies to the newly deemed products. This means that any product that has been introduced or changed in any way since that date will be subject to the premarket review process. This means that all or almost all e-cigarettes will be subject to premarket review.
Alert — FDA Deeming Regulations Issued
The FDA issued this morning its long-awaited deeming regulations, which will subject all tobacco products (including e-cigarettes, cigars and pipe tobacco) to the FDA’s regulatory authority. We are currently digesting the regulations and will be posting a series of blog entries regarding various aspects.
Our initial impression is that, notwithstanding…
House Appropriations Committee Seeks to Exempt Premium Cigars, Relax Regulatory Burdens on Vapor Products
The House Appropriations Committee recently approved funding language that would exempt traditional large and premium cigars from FDA regulation and substantially lessen the regulatory burden on vapor products.
Troutman Sanders Tobacco Practice Partner to Speak at 2016 FDLI Annual Conference
We are excited to be participating in the 2016 Food and Drug Law Institute (“FDLI”) Annual Conference. This two-day conference on May 5-6, 2016 will host experts from the federal government in addition to representatives from the private sector. Bryan Haynes will be speaking on Thursday, May 5th in a…
Texas Supreme Court Upholds Tax on Non-Settling Tobacco Companies
On April 1, 2016, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that the state could impose a special tax on cigarette manufacturers that were not part of a multibillion-dollar settlement agreement reached with the major tobacco companies in the late 1990s.