U.S. Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson has denied a motion to transfer the Deeming Regulations challenge in En Fuego Tobacco Shop LLC, et al. v. U.S. Food & Drug Administration, et al., No. 4:18-cv-00028 (E.D. Tex.). On June 5, the FDA appealed her decision to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Continue Reading Deeming Regulations Litigation Update–Motion to Transfer Cigar Challenge Denied, Appealed by FDA
The Federal Trade Commission recently issued its Cigarette Report and Smokeless Tobacco Report summarizing 2016 data about the tobacco industry. Important observations from the Cigarette Report include:
- The number of cigarettes that the largest cigarette companies in the United States sold to wholesalers and retailers nationwide declined from 244.2 billion in 2015 to 240.5 billion in 2016;
- The amount spent on cigarette advertising and promotion increased from $8.30 billion in 2015 to $8.71 billion in 2016; and
- Price discounts paid to cigarette retailers ($5.81 billion) and wholesalers ($1.44 billion) were the two largest expenditure categories in 2016. Combined spending on price discounts increased from $6.95 billion in 2015 to $7.25 billion in 2016, accounting for 83.2 percent of industry spending.
On April 24, 2018, Troutman attorneys Bryan Haynes and Paige Fitzgerald presented an American Bar Association webinar on the regulations of e-cigarettes and other Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS).
You may purchase the recording of Bryan and Paige’s seminar here.
A federal court has dismissed a case challenging the FDA’s allowance of the word “natural” in Natural American Spirit’s (“NAS”) product packaging and labeling. The Plaintiff lacks standing to sue under Article III, § 2, of the U.S. Constitution, which limits federal courts to deciding actual “cases” or “controversies.” Continue Reading Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Force FDA Action Against Tobacco Company
On January 30, 2018, three separate challenges to the Deeming Regulations were filed by vapor-industry plaintiffs represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation (“PLF”), each raising issues under the Appointments Clause and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution:
- Moose Jooce, et al. v. Food & Drug Admin., et al., No. 1:18-cv-203 (D.D.C.);
- Rave Salon, Inc. v. Gottlieb, et al., No. 3:18-cv-237 (N.D. Tex.); and
- Hoban, et al. v. Food & Drug Admin., et al., No. 0:18-cv-269 (D. Minn.).
When PLF announced the filings, it characterized “[t]hese three simultaneously filed lawsuits” as an “opening salvo.” Will the FDA be able to outmaneuver the three-pronged attack? Continue Reading Deeming Regulations Litigation Update–FDA Seeking to Consolidate PLF Legal Challenges in Single Court
Earlier this month, we reported on a lawsuit filed by U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company (UST) challenging the FDA’s issuance of Not Substantially Equivalent Orders for a smokeless tobacco product. The FDA has now moved to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after rescinding the NSE orders at issue. Continue Reading FDA Moves to Dismiss Suit Regarding SE Standards
Bryan Haynes will moderate a panel entitled FDA implementation of Tobacco Product Pathways. Panelists, which include the Director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products Office of Science, will discuss the FDA’s implementation of tobacco product review pathways including premarket tobacco applications and modified risk tobacco product applications, as well as impacts on consumers, manufacturers, and tobacco harm reduction efforts. Panelists will also address opportunities to clarify the implementation of these pathways, including the current status of substantial equivalence applications and the need for a clear set of achievable requirements for product review submissions.
We look forward to seeing our clients and friends at the conference.
Should vapor products be regulated the same, regardless of whether they contain nicotine? A bill before the Louisiana State Legislature would accomplish just that, with respect to the State’s laws on such things as retailer permits, over-the-counter sales, self-service displays, and vending machines. Continue Reading Louisiana Bill Would Extend Vapor Laws to Non-Nicotine Products
In connection with FDA Commissioner Scott Gottleib’s July 2017 announcement regarding a new comprehensive nicotine strategy, the FDA gave manufacturers an extension to comply with certain deadlines under the Deeming Regulations. The extension governed all premarket review submissions for newly-deemed products and “applie[d] only to compliance deadlines relating to . . . substantial equivalence exemption requests (SE EX requests), substantial equivalence reports (SE reports), and premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs).” Continue Reading Deeming Regulations Litigation Update—Anti-Tobacco Groups Challenge the FDA’s Extension of Deadlines for Premarket Review Submissions
On February 2, 2018, U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company (UST) (the smokeless tobacco arm of Altria Group) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the FDA’s issuance of “Not Substantially Equivalent” (NSE) Orders for a new, portioned moist smokeless product, Copenhagen Bold Wintergreen Flavor Packs (Copenhagen Bold). This appears to be the first lawsuit challenging the FDA’s denial of an SE submission for a specific product. Continue Reading UST Sues the FDA Regarding SE Standards