Skip to content

menu

Troutman Pepper Locke logo
HomeAbout the BlogContactTopics
Subscribe
Search
Close

Tobacco Law Blog

Lawsuits Being Filed Against the FDA Regarding Deeming Regulations

By Troutman Pepper Locke Tobacco Practice on August 16, 2016
Posted in FDA, State Regulatory

In May through July several groups have filed lawsuits against the US Food and Drug Administration alleging that the deeming regulations that expand the regulation by FDA of additional tobacco products violate the law.

Currently there are eight lawsuits pending, of which 5 pertain to the vapor industry.  Two of these five have been consolidated because they address similar claims.

Nicopure Labs LLC was the first to file and its case will be consolidated with one filed by eleven vapor trade associations.  It asks the court to set aside the unlawful deeming regulations. The FDA estimates that pre-market review will cost $300,000 per product. In this event,  Nicopure Labs alleges that the company, which has 2400 stock keeping units, would have to pay $720,000,000, using FDA’s own estimate per product, to process PMTAs to get its products approved by FDA. However, Nicopure believes the actual cost will be closer to $2-3M per stock keeping unit.  Either way, the cost of complying with the deeming regulations, concludes Nicopure, effectively eliminates the company’s ability to comply.  

Three vape shops filed a law suit, seeking a jury trial, claiming the requirements of the deeming regulations on the vaping industry will effectively eliminate the entire industry.  Another lawsuit was filed by a West Virginia Legislator who claims he was able to quit smoking using vapor products, but that he will likely not be able to use them if they are eliminated by these regulations, and thus will have no choice but to return to use of tobacco products.  

These cases raise an array of legal issues for the vapor industry including that FDA has: (i) improperly regulated vapor products which do not contain tobacco; (ii) failed to consider the effect of deeming regulations on small businesses as required by law; (iii) not quantified costs on small businesses, nor considered any alternatives; (iv) overstated benefits, and understated costs of complying.

 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
Florida AG Sues Retailers for Alleged Violations of Nicotine Product and Consumer Protection Laws
January 26, 2026
Federal Court Bars Enforcement of Virginia Vapor Directory, Pending Fourth Circuit Ruling
December 24, 2025
12 Days of Regulatory Insights: Day 7 – Tobacco and Nicotine Regulatory Roundup
December 12, 2025

Subscribe + Follow

Recent Updates

  • Florida AG Sues Retailers for Alleged Violations of Nicotine Product and Consumer Protection Laws
  • Three Troutman Attorneys to Serve on FDLI Committees for 2026
  • Federal Court Bars Enforcement of Virginia Vapor Directory, Pending Fourth Circuit Ruling
Subscribe

Connect

RSS Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Instagram
Troutman Pepper Locke logo
RSS Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Instagram
Legal NoticesGlobal Privacy NoticeNotice at Collection
  • Home
  • About the Blog
  • Contact
  • Topics

About Troutman Pepper Locke

Troutman Pepper Locke helps clients solve complex legal challenges and achieve their business goals in an ever-changing global economy. With more than 1,600 attorneys in 30+ offices, the firm serves clients in all major industry sectors, with particular depth in energy, financial services, health care and life sciences, insurance and reinsurance, private equity, and real estate. Learn more at troutman.com.

Copyright © 2026, Troutman Pepper Locke. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo

In addition to cookies that are necessary for website operation, this website uses cookies and other tracking tools for various purposes, including to provide enhanced functionality and measure website performance. To learn more about our information practices, please visit our Global Privacy Notice.

AgreeDecline